That’s true with photos, too.” Tinder’s data team echoed this, noting that there isn’t a cliquey, high school mentality on the site, where one group of users gets the share of “like” swipes.
While Tinder seems to have done a lot of things right, the company has also made plenty of mistakes.
Indeed, in many respects, it can be the other way around. Eastwick, an assistant professor of human development and family sciences at the University of Texas at Austin, and Lucy L.
Hunt, a graduate student, published a paper noting that a person’s unique looks are what is most important when trying to find a mate.“There isn’t a consensus about who is attractive and who isn’t,” Mr. “Someone that you think is especially attractive might not be to me.
The team pored through more than 80 years of scientific research about dating and attraction, and was unable to prove that computers can indeed match people together.
While companies like e Harmony still assert they have a “scientific approach” to helping people fall in love, some dating sites are starting to acknowledge that the only thing that matters when matching lovers is someone’s picture.
No discussion of your favorite hiking trail, star sign or sexual proclivities.
almost nothing.”But this doesn’t mean that the most attractive people are the only ones who find true love.Women spend as much as 8.5 minutes swiping left and right during a single session; men spend 7.2 minutes. While conventional online dating sites have been around longer, they haven’t come close to the popularity of Tinder.Scientists and relationship specialists who study online dating suggest it isn’t what Tinder is doing correctly, but rather what earlier dating sites have done wrong.’ ” said Sean Rad, co-founder and chief executive of Tinder, referring to the questionnaires on most dating sites.“That’s not how we think about meeting new people in real life.”On Tinder, there are no questionnaires to fill out.